Jump to content

Custom Search





Welcome to the Lincoln MKZ Forum - home of the Lincoln MKZ Club


Sign In  Log in with Facebook

Create Account
Welcome to the Lincoln MKZ Forum. You must register to create topics or post in our community - but don't worry, this is a simple and free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of the Lincoln MKZ Forum by signing up for a free account today and enjoy these benefits:
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members
  • Create a photo album and post photos
  • Receive special offers and discounts
  • Invitations to events. . .and more!
Click here to create an account now
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Check out the Lincoln Continental Forum Here.


Photo
- - - - -

MKZ motor options


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 08 July 2015 - 12:12 PM

I have found it interesting to hear reviewers (mainly big companies or well known reviewers) say that they feel there is no reason to upgrade to the 3.7L over the 2.0 eco.  Now I am a younger guy, but I have owned and driven 4cyl, 4cyl turbos, 4cyl boxer turbo, v6, v8, and v10 cars with all different displacements in FWD, RWD, and AWD.  With that said I noticed a considerable difference in power between the 3.7L and 2.0eco.  Do not get me wrong the 2.0 is a great motor (have it in my wife's escape and love it!) but I just don't see these motors as being close enough for a true car enthusiast to say it really doesn't matter.  It is as if they are saying you won't notice a difference.  

 

I suppose this is more of a rant than anything, my bad, but I just didn't understand where people are coming from on this. Again, both are great motors...not putting one ahead of the other overall, but if we are talking seat of your pants feel I just think the 3.7 should be getting the nod.  I suppose it is possible reviewers are also considering mpg?  

 

Being that the 2.0 is newer with direct injection and a turbo, I would think longevity (less potential maintenance) of the 3.7 would negate much of the difference in mpgs.  Perhaps that is flawed thinking though.

 

Anyone agree or feel that there really isn't a big "feel" difference between the two?


  • JoeBrown likes this





Lose this advertisement by becoming a member. Click here to create a free account.

#2 drolds1

drolds1

    New MKZ Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,021 posts
  • Region:Decline
  • LocationLI, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:Decline
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2017 MKZ 3.0T AWD Sport Package

Posted 08 July 2015 - 12:38 PM

There's definitely a big difference.  I've driven both. After having the 2.0 demo for 24 hours as part of the Lincoln Date Night promotional, there was no question in my mind that the 3.7 was the only choice for me. It's just fine for the average buyer but I'm not the average buyer. Back in the day I was drag racer. I see many more 2.0s around here than 3.7s, proving the point.  I also don't feel that this engine is refined enough to be in a Lincoln.  IMO, the 2.3 Ecoboost from the MKC should be the entry level engine in the MKZ. They promised that the "new" Lincolns would have exclusive engines.  True for the  3.7.  Not so much for the ubiquitous 2.0.  My daughter's Escape has that engine, which it's OK for.   I'm hoping they'll offer the 2.7 EB in the future.


Edited by drolds1, 08 July 2015 - 12:39 PM.

  • Robert Iggy Cerami, JoeBrown and BlackPano like this

#3 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 08 July 2015 - 12:50 PM

Glad I am not alone here.  I drove both and felt the same way.  The 2.0 was nice but it felt like settling for me.  As you said I am sure it is great for many as I also see more of those than the 3.7.

 

I too use to drag race (my dad still does...see pics here)

 

What car(s) did you race?


Edited by BlackPano, 08 July 2015 - 12:51 PM.


#4 JoeBrown

JoeBrown

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Club Member
  • 350 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationMount Vernon, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:2014
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2014, 3.7L V6, AWD. Ruby Red/ Dune

Posted 08 July 2015 - 12:59 PM

Well, first of all if one has the 3.7 with AWD that indicates to me that gas mileage is not much of a concern. The fact that I don't need 91 octane (which is what my Lincoln LS V6 required) saves me a few pennies.

 

I don't know timing numbers all I know is when I "punch" my 3.7 it snaps my head back and really gets underway. I just can't see the 2.0 being equal or better overall. I tell you what, when I'm tryng to merge onto the highway I have no worries about getting up to speed.

 

I too have seen the reviews that suggested getting the 2.0 instead of the 3.7. My reaction to those reviewers is they are ignorant. I wonder if they actually drove both versions and compared them. Probably not.

 

I also was a drag racer having competed at New York National Raceway on Long Island. I had a 1965 Plymouth Barracuda in those days.


  • Robert Iggy Cerami and BlackPano like this

#5 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 08 July 2015 - 01:08 PM

Well, first of all if one has the 3.7 with AWD that indicates to me that gas mileage is not much of a concern. The fact that I don't need 91 octane (which is what my Lincoln LS V6 required) saves me a few pennies.

 

I don't know timing numbers all I know is when I "punch" my 3.7 it snaps my head back and really gets underway. I just can't see the 2.0 being equal or better overall. I tell you what, when I'm tryng to merge onto the highway I have no worries about getting up to speed.

 

I too have seen the reviews that suggested getting the 2.0 instead of the 3.7. My reaction to those reviewers is they are ignorant. I wonder if they actually drove both versions and compared them. Probably not.

 

I also was a drag racer having competed at New York National Raceway on Long Island. I had a 1965 Plymouth Barracuda in those days.

 

With the 273ci?

 

And you are probably right that the reviewers never actually drove the 3.7 (it seems many referenced the 2.0 in the write up).  I found it humorous that they all inevitably talked about the equal torque numbers and how that is what gives someone the "head snap" effect.  So based on that little nugget the assumption is they both feel the same until you get to higher speed when horsepower takes over... :doh:


Edited by BlackPano, 08 July 2015 - 01:14 PM.


#6 JoeBrown

JoeBrown

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Club Member
  • 350 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationMount Vernon, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:2014
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2014, 3.7L V6, AWD. Ruby Red/ Dune

Posted 08 July 2015 - 01:22 PM

With the 273ci?

 

And you are probably right that the reviewers never actually drove the 3.7 (it seems many referenced the 2.0 in the write up).  I found it humorous that they all inevitably talked about the equal torque numbers and how that is what gives someone the "head snap" effect.  So based on that little nugget the assumption is they both feel the same until you get to higher speed when horsepower takes over... :doh:

Yes the 273CI V8  with the Toqueflite transmission. I used to eat those 289CI Mustangs alive.



#7 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 08 July 2015 - 04:42 PM

Based on responses to this topic, I pose this question:

Which motors (past or present) would you like to see offered for the mkz?
Do try to be realistic haha.

#8 2015mkzhybrid

2015mkzhybrid

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 80 posts
  • Region:Canada Ontario
  • LocationDunrobin
  • My MKZ's Year:2015
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2015 Lincoln MKZ Hybrid, 2002 Thunderbird, 2008 Chrysler Sebring Limited Retractable

Posted 08 July 2015 - 04:53 PM

This is an interesting topic. I think the type of engine one would like for their MKZ relates to why one bought an MKZ. For me, I wanted smoothness, good acceleration and fuel economy. The 2.0 Hybrid met all the criteria for me. In fact, I was surprised how good the passing gear is on the Hybrid.

Mind you, I also own a CTS and a Thunderbird show car - both give me that rocket ship feeling when I want them to go.
  • BlackPano likes this

#9 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 08 July 2015 - 05:31 PM

Good points. I am sure some people are quite happy with the current offerings. Personally I won't complain (too loudly) about the 3.7 as the "performance" option, but it would be nice to offer the 3.5 turbo in the mks. I mean Lincoln did send out models for review with the not stock super sport tires, so clearly they do care about how the mkz stacks up performance wise. I don't believe they would see much of a drop in mpg with a larger turbo motor offering since the car weighs so much that the 2.0 is getting into boost fairly quickly/frequently.

So I would like to see:
The current hybrid 2.0
2.3 Eco boost
3.5 Eco boost or a revamped 4.6L (I have a soft spot for that motor)

#10 drolds1

drolds1

    New MKZ Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,021 posts
  • Region:Decline
  • LocationLI, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:Decline
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2017 MKZ 3.0T AWD Sport Package

Posted 08 July 2015 - 08:28 PM

Well, first of all if one has the 3.7 with AWD that indicates to me that gas mileage is not much of a concern. The fact that I don't need 91 octane (which is what my Lincoln LS V6 required) saves me a few pennies.

 

I don't know timing numbers all I know is when I "punch" my 3.7 it snaps my head back and really gets underway. I just can't see the 2.0 being equal or better overall. I tell you what, when I'm tryng to merge onto the highway I have no worries about getting up to speed.

 

I too have seen the reviews that suggested getting the 2.0 instead of the 3.7. My reaction to those reviewers is they are ignorant. I wonder if they actually drove both versions and compared them. Probably not.

 

I also was a drag racer having competed at New York National Raceway on Long Island. I had a 1965 Plymouth Barracuda in those days.

Get outta town, Joe!  I raced at NY Nat'l. Speedway too.  I won a couple of trophies there. First with a 66 Olds Cutlass, 330ci, 320hp.  A real sleeper.  After that a 69 Olds 442 W30.  A rare car.

 

Some nostalgia for youworlds-finest-ny-national-speedway-tee-s



#11 drolds1

drolds1

    New MKZ Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,021 posts
  • Region:Decline
  • LocationLI, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:Decline
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2017 MKZ 3.0T AWD Sport Package

Posted 08 July 2015 - 08:30 PM

Yes the 273CI V8  with the Toqueflite transmission. I used to eat those 289CI Mustangs alive.

My friend had a 67 Dart with the 273 2bbl and Torqueflite.  He surprised a lot of cars with that thing.



#12 drolds1

drolds1

    New MKZ Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,021 posts
  • Region:Decline
  • LocationLI, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:Decline
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2017 MKZ 3.0T AWD Sport Package

Posted 08 July 2015 - 08:35 PM

Good points. I am sure some people are quite happy with the current offerings. Personally I won't complain (too loudly) about the 3.7 as the "performance" option, but it would be nice to offer the 3.5 turbo in the mks. I mean Lincoln did send out models for review with the not stock super sport tires, so clearly they do care about how the mkz stacks up performance wise. I don't believe they would see much of a drop in mpg with a larger turbo motor offering since the car weighs so much that the 2.0 is getting into boost fairly quickly/frequently.

So I would like to see:
The current hybrid 2.0
2.3 Eco boost
3.5 Eco boost or a revamped 4.6L (I have a soft spot for that motor)

Aside from being out of production, I doubt that the 4.6 would even fit in this chassis crossways.  I'd go for the 3.5EB but I think that the 2.7EB is more likely.  A few years ago the rumor was that it was being developed for Lincoln. I was surprised to see it turn up in the F-150 first.



#13 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 08 July 2015 - 08:48 PM

Yeah I was thinking 2.7 as well but wasn't sure how it was designed since its in the f150
And I realize the 4.6 is a no go, just would be fun.

#14 drolds1

drolds1

    New MKZ Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,021 posts
  • Region:Decline
  • LocationLI, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:Decline
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2017 MKZ 3.0T AWD Sport Package

Posted 09 July 2015 - 01:11 AM

IDK if it was designed just for the F-150. It's also available in the new Explorer, Edge and MKX.  I have a suspicion we'll be seeing it in other applications.  The forthcoming Continental is supposed to be powered by a 3.0EB.  I wonder if it's an enlarged version of the 2.7. 



#15 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 09 July 2015 - 04:52 AM

They have not seemed shy about rolling out new displacements of similar design of late. I don't see anything above the 2.7 going into the mkz. It very well could be the 2.3 and 2.7 that are offered in future iterations.

#16 JoeBrown

JoeBrown

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Club Member
  • 350 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationMount Vernon, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:2014
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2014, 3.7L V6, AWD. Ruby Red/ Dune

Posted 09 July 2015 - 08:08 AM

Get outta town, Joe!  I raced at NY Nat'l. Speedway too.  I won a couple of trophies there. First with a 66 Olds Cutlass, 330ci, 320hp.  A real sleeper.  After that a 69 Olds 442 W30.  A rare car.

 

Some nostalgia for youworlds-finest-ny-national-speedway-tee-s

Wow! You got the t-shirt. Yes I won a few trophies there. But most of all I liked going to see the "funny cars."



#17 BlackPano

BlackPano

    New MKZ Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • PipPip
  • 95 posts
  • Region:U.S. Northeast
  • LocationPA
  • My MKZ's Year:2013
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Black 3.7 AWD Preferred

Posted 09 July 2015 - 08:38 AM

There use to be a strip right down from where I live at the airport on rt.30 outside of York, PA (in Thomasville).  I think it was called rt.30.  They had a few famous racers from my understanding. It closed before my time though.  However, I've been/raced at South Mountain Dragway, Mason Dixon, Beaver Springs, and Maple Grove (nationals for High School class).  I was able to see some of the "funny cars" run at South Mountain when I went there regularly.  One of my favorite classes is the Pro-stick class.



#18 drolds1

drolds1

    New MKZ Member

  • Moderators
  • 1,021 posts
  • Region:Decline
  • LocationLI, NY
  • My MKZ's Year:Decline
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:2017 MKZ 3.0T AWD Sport Package

Posted 09 July 2015 - 10:52 AM

Wow! You got the t-shirt. Yes I won a few trophies there. But most of all I liked going to see the "funny cars."

No, not mine,Joe.  I got the image off the web. ;)


Edited by drolds1, 09 July 2015 - 10:54 AM.


#19 robertlane

robertlane

    New MKZ Member

  • Moderators
  • 447 posts
  • Region:U.S. Great Lakes
  • LocationDearborn, MI
  • My MKZ's Year:Decline
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:GT500KR, E350, Shelby Terlingua

Posted 09 July 2015 - 02:48 PM

There's definitely a big difference.  I've driven both. After having the 2.0 demo for 24 hours as part of the Lincoln Date Night promotional, there was no question in my mind that the 3.7 was the only choice for me. It's just fine for the average buyer but I'm not the average buyer. Back in the day I was drag racer. I see many more 2.0s around here than 3.7s, proving the point.  I also don't feel that this engine is refined enough to be in a Lincoln.  IMO, the 2.3 Ecoboost from the MKC should be the entry level engine in the MKZ. They promised that the "new" Lincolns would have exclusive engines.  True for the  3.7.  Not so much for the ubiquitous 2.0.  My daughter's Escape has that engine, which it's OK for.   I'm hoping they'll offer the 2.7 EB in the future.

 

Not sure what happened to those Lincoln exclusive engines: the 2.3L powers the Mustang and the 2.7L powers the F-Series.  


Lincoln MKZ Forum Help Guides

Easy tutorial guide.

Forum software help guide.

#20 Billyb

Billyb

    New Member

  • Lincoln MKZ Member
  • Pip
  • 5 posts
  • Region:U.S. Mississippi Valley
  • LocationSt louis
  • My MKZ's Year:None
  • My MKZ: mymkz
  • Current Vehicle:Vw Passat tdi

Posted 05 August 2016 - 11:15 PM

I realize this is an old thread, but the question remains...

What are your thoughts on the 2.0 vs 3.0 for the 2017 model? Has anyone driven both?

Thanks,






Custom Search


Privacy Policy Terms of Service ·